Print
12
Jan

December 2004 Subscriptions Beat Expectations

December 2004 brought astonishing results: total cellular subscriber net additions in the country climbed to 8.3 mln - almost 2 times higher than in previous month and 3 times higher compared to December 2003. The cellular penetration in the country passed 50% milestone(!) - more than two times higher compared to 2003 results.

According to our esimates the total number of cellular subscribers in Russia reached 73.9 mln as of year-end 2004!

Russian Mobile Subscribers

Mobile Subscribers December 31, 2004 November 30, 2004 December 31, 2003
Total Russia 73,855,000 65,590,000 36,230,000
  Penetration 50.9% 45.2% 25.0%
Moscow 16,854,605 15,105,908 11,487,308
  Penetration 99.2% 92.1% 67.6%
St.Petersburg 5,644,334 5,313,694 3,532,859
  Penetration 89.0% 83.8% 55.7%
Subscribers outside Moscow and St.Pete 51,356,061 44,641,478 21,209,833
  Penetration 42.1% 36.6% 17.4%
Russian Cellular
Market Breakdown, December 2004
Russian Net Additions,
December 2004

Top 10 Mobile Operators

# Company December 31, 2004 November 30, 2004
1 MTS 35,395,000 30,595,000
Moscow
7,470,000 6,985,000
Ukraine (UMC)
7,400,000 6,266,000
Belarus
1,215,000 1,100,000
Uzbekistan
310,000 287,000
2 Vimpelcom 26,550,000 23,160,000
Moscow
7,475,000 6,960,000
Kazakhstan
859,000 745,000
3 MegaFon 13,647,807 12,756,890
Moscow
1,817,314 1,603,751
Tajikistan
47,891 38,817
4 Uralsvyazinform 2,058,100 1,937,300
5 SMARTS Group 1,815,000 1,690,640
6 Sibirtelecom 1,001,900 861,600
7 N.Novgorod Cellular 656,441 596,945
8 Ekaterinburg Cellular Communications - MOTIV 405,467 354,572
9 New Telephone Company 262,205 236,800
10 Skylink 190,200 189,000

Note: Although Tele2 has approximately 1.05 mln subscribers in Russia we do not list the company in the Top-10 table as the company does not provide officially confirmed figures for its Russian branch. Nevertheless, we do account our Tele2 subscriber estimates in Russia total numbers.

Moscow and St.Petersburg

Moscow License Area

The penetration in the Russian largest market - Moscow - was 99.2% (!) as of 31-Dec-04 (68% in 2003). With both MTS and Vimpelcom signing almost equal number of subscribers, the latter did slightly better and re-gained leadership in the capital. MegaFon's contribution to the Christmas sale campaign in Moscow was 18% or 215 thsd subscribers.

Moscow Market Breakdown
December 31, 2004

Net Additions in Moscow,
December 2004

St.Petersburg and Leningrad Region

MTS led in subscriber addition race in St.Petersburg signing up record high 131 thsd users. Vimpelcom came second with 117 thsd which is also a record high net adds for the company in St.Petersburg.

St. Petersburg Market Breakdown
December 31, 2004
Net Additions in St.Petersburg
December 2004

Regions outside Moscow and St.Pete

MTS came #1 in regional net sales. Please note that MTS' regional additions also included subscribers of the two regional telcos acquired in December - Horizont RT (~100,000) and Telesot Alaniya (~50,000). In terms of the regional market breakdown Vimpelcom has maintained leadership with 17.2 mln customers with MTS following with just a few dozen thousands less.

Regional Market Breakdown
December 31, 2004
Regional Net Additions
December 2004

Notice on Subscriber Accounting Policies

As penetration in Moscow approaches 100% there is a growing concern over the widening gap between the human penetration and what is reported based on the churn policy by the operators themselves.

Based on the end user surveys, AC&M believes, that the difference between the actual number of active users and combined subscriber numbers reported by the operators in Moscow license area is about 22%. However, several market observers are even more conservative. They reckon that the gap is between 25% and 35%. This gap is the result of marketing actions (including SIM-card give-aways) by operators.

There is also some discrepancy in the subscriber numbers caused by the difference in the churn policies by the operators. MTS, for example, terminates their pre-paid subscribers after one of the two events occur, whichever comes first: (i) their balance remains $0 or below for 183 consecutive days or (ii) they demonstrate no chargeable transactions within 183 days. Vimpelcom follows similar churn policy, but with a minor modification: provided there is no chargeable activity but the balance still remains positive, the customer is first blocked for 180 days and terminated only after the following 180 days. MegaFon has been historically practicing the strictest churn policy among the "Big Three". They unconditionally terminate the user's account if subscriber is blocked for more than 90 days.

Despite the fact that Vimpelcom's and MTS churn policies differ we believe that at the moment the subscriber base of two largest Russian operators are quite comparable:

  • Vimpelcom has performed a significant clean-up of subscriber base back in July-August 2004 when the company was short of numbering capacity. In the effort to free unused numbers Vimpelcom decreased inactivity period for subscribers to 3-4 months (depending on the region) from its normal inactivity time of 180 days. All subscribers inactive for the longer period were terminated. After receiving required numbering capacity the company returned to its usual churn policy in August-September 2004. Therefore, the maximum inactivity time for Vimpelcom subscriber with positive account balance was around 7 months in December 2004, which is pretty close to MTS subscribers maximum inactivity period of 183 days.
  • According to our information the share of Vimpelcom subscribers who have positive cash balance at the moment when they may be blocked is insignificant. The company states that this number is less than 5% of users which account is blocked or terminated after 180 days of inactivity.

We expect that cellular penetration will be over 100% in Moscow already in January 2005. One should understand that this is effectively a number of user accounts which are active according to operator's churn policy. The correlation between human penetration and number of active user accounts differs from region to region.

Although AC&M have estimations on the subject and conduct regular end-user survey, we do not publish this information as it is always a subject for additional research. If you are interested in more information on any particular region please do not hesitate to contant us at This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .